# 3/21/11

Written by G. T. Hushion. Posted in Articles

We look at a roulette wheel and we see a roulette wheel. A passing waitress accidentally drops a glass on the wheel. It lands on a particular pocket. Is that a random event? Relative to what?

It was a random event, but it was not relative to the game. It was relative to its own field. In this case the field would be glasses accidentally dropped on a wheel.

If it is a single event. It is relative to nothing.

We see a roulette wheel and it appears complete with two dimensions that match our perceptions. We test it with several spins and balls and the traditional methodology. That is: Monte Carlo methodology in which all random events are counted and average. The resulting statistics match our perceptions of a wheel of two dimensions: diameter and cross-diameter. The two dimensions each have an end pole. These are the 4 Cardinal poles. Each Cardinal pole is an equal .25 algebraic possibility. In 4 random trials, each pocket will tend to averagely appear once.

Relative to the “game” and relative to our perceptions, the wheel is balanced and traditional random theory is proven again.

Except…relative to the randomness we seek, the resulting statistics from Monte Carlo methodology only match our perceptions.

Relative to the randomness of gravity –instead of relative to our perceptions of randomness– the random geometric truth that gravity is actually delivering is not on a circle or wheel. It is on the straight line of a pi-angle.

That random geometric truth is only found by super imposing “action at a distance” upon Monte Carlo methodology.

Relative to traditional random theory and life’s perceptions …and always delivered by Monte Carlo methodology, only a wheel of 4 Cardinal poles is rotating and/or being randomly measured.

Relative to “action at a distance” only a pi-angle of 4 poles is rotating and/or being randomly measured. They are not equal. In four random trials, the geometric probabilities look like this:

The first trial is a one end of a pi angle. Without further knowledge, it may be assumed to have a random value of 1/4 C or relative 1/4 pi. That value changes as relativity appears as the series evolves.

The second event gives proof of relative 1/4 pi. This is the original Needle. It is the Needle’s relativity to the pi-angle that is given life by “action at a distance.” The random event that mathematically appears as 1/4 C becomes a possibility of .50 on the relative cross diameter. That is: it geometrically becomes the Center of Rotation relative to the cross diameter. This is the second event in the series of four. This is the event that is finessed through.

The third event is the pi-angle pole. It has (the subject of this book) a random value of .33333 . The flat bet advantage is the difference between the pi-angle value of .33333 less the Cardinal pole value of .25 . The difference is factored by two directions. This values the pi-angle pole at: .16666 . This is the gravity bet.

The statistics of the pi-odds study, indicate that the true random value of the first event is not relative 1/4 pi, but rather one twelfth pi (that is: 1/12 pi). Discussions are found herein. That totals seventy five percent of gravity’s random pull over three random trials. What of the remaining twenty five percent? What of the fourth trial?

The fourth trial completes the truth of quadrature. It is meaningless relative to gravity. The random measure of gravity was complete with three trials. The fourth trial is relative to nothing but life’s perception of the Center of Rotation or a Cardinal pole. The fourth trial statistically appears as exactly what traditional random theory and quadrature expect. That is: .25 .

A sequence of four random measurements under traditional random theory will tend to look like this in any order: North; South; East; West.

A sequence of four random measurements using “action at a distance” will tend to look like this, in this specific order: South as a pi angle base with a random value of 1/12 pi; the Center of Rotation with a random value of 1/2 pi; the pi-angle pole with a random value of 1/6 pi; the Center of Rotation with a random value of 1/4 pi.

By the proof of the original Needle, The field or circle or “game” is pi. Without relativity, a random event’s possibility is 1/12 pi. With relativity, the unit of measure is the geometric probability of relative 1/4 pi. The bridge to which the unit of measure is applied is 1/2 pi. The grail is found as 1/6 pi. Gravity is found as pi divided by pi.

# 3/18/11

Written by G. T. Hushion. Posted in Articles

The original Needle introduced three unequal layers of relativity into randomness: relative to life’s perceptions; relative to pi; relative to gravity. Each random event contains all three layers simultaneously.

As previously discussed, the relativity to life’s perceptions is meaningless relative to gravity. The random “relativity” we try to understand in a world of quadrature and perception only has “relativity” relative to more perceptions.

The relativity of pi is found in the random value of 1/4 pi as the universal random unit of measure.

The relativity of gravity is found and proven with “action at a distance” with relative 1/6 pi as a pi-angle end pole, relative to gravity’s pi-angle pull. However, this relativity must be made relative back to life’s perceptions. Otherwise, we cannot recognize or understand it. The connection back from gravity to perception is also through pi.

Without pi, there is no random mathematical connection between gravity and life’s perceptions.

Let there be three serial random events on a 38 pocket wheel. Let them be pockets: “7,” “24″ and “19.”

Pocket “7″ cannot yet be relative to anything (noting that it naturally contains probabilities as the COR relative to the last trial and the relative pi-angle pole of the second last trial).

Pocket “24″ is, through the magic of the original Needle, the COR relative to “7.” Other than its profound significance as relative 14 pi, this relativity is meaningless relative to gravity and randomness, since both “7″ and “24″ are also on the circle or wheel or “game.”

Pocket “19″ holds the random gravitational truth. On a standard American wheel, pocket “19″ is within the relative pi-angle pole, relative to pocket “7.” The size of the pole is 60 degrees of arc on the wheel.

The relative pi-angle pole contains the “uncertainty principle” of Quantum Mechanics. It is “uncertain” because it is only a range of probabilities.

The exact sciences predict a precise average. It is the length of the original Needle. That is: 1/4 of the distance around the wheel or circle or game or card suit under observation.

The difference between the exact sciences and the uncertainty principle of Quantum theory is exactly this. The exact sciences predict the universal random average to exactly be the algebraic possibilities of the original Needle using Monte Carlo methodology. This delivers an average with pinpoint accuracy. That is: 1/4 C.

In contrast, the Quantum sciences predict a relative pi-angle pole as a geometric probability within a relatively wide range of “pockets.”

The exact sciences predict an exact average on a wheel. This is the foundation of traditional random theory. In the exact sciences, relativity is meaningless. It is just algebra on a wheel, “relative” to more algebra on the wheel.

Action at a distance predicts a wide range of geometric probability on the wheel’s pi-angle. This is the foundation of the flat bet advantage. With “action at a distance,” the relativity in geometric probability is everything.

The Circus will explore these matters of relativity, first in roulette, then in the randomness of more relevant issues.

# 3/16/11

Written by G. T. Hushion. Posted in Articles

Let’s revisit relativity.

In 1733, the original Needle mathematically separated perception from gravity. In doing so it appeared to deliver three layers of relativity. Two are gravitationally meaningless.

The Needle’s vehicle was its length. That is the universal average unit of random measurement: .78539…. diameter. That is: relative 1/4 pi, relative to the randomly measured field’s diameter.

As it mathematically separated perception from gravity, the original Needle identified gravity by its straight line pull along a diameter. By the nature of the original Needle’s question, gravity itself valued the diameter gravity was pulling on with a random value: “1.”

The original Needle mathematically identifies a circle as a mathematical average. That is: four times the original Needle’s length of 1/4 C. That is: 4 (1/4 C) = C.

The vehicle used to find 1/4 C was the original Needle’s length: relative 1/4 pi, relative to the diameter.

The diameter does not need to be expressed as “relative.” It is already the very thing that everything else is relative to in the first instance of randomness.

The original Needle proved its universal average random length to be one fourth of the circle being randomly measured. However, the statement that “1/4 C” is “relative” to C is meaningless. The statement is already an integral part of C.

The original Needle proved the only mathematical statement that had random relativity meaning was relative 1/4 pi.

One can speak of one half pi as having relativity but it confusingly appears both meaninglessly “relative” to the circle it is already a part (by identifying its end poles as Cardinal poles of 90 degrees each) and confusingly “relative” to the diameter end poles it identifies as relative pi-angle poles (of 60 degrees each) relative to the pi-angle base (or “diameter” base). This confusion is what “spooked” Einstein.

Statistically, the randomness of geometric probability is gravitationally and fundamentally DIFFERENT from the statistical algebraic expectations of possibilities that form traditional random theory.

The key to the difference is the relativity of the unit of measurement. If the unit of measurement is an inch or light year or dollar or chip or mental exercise or anything other than relative 1/4 pi …the meaning of relativity is lost …as the measurements are simply, in the most profound sense, only going around in circles.

Traditional random theory can pinpoint the universal random average of 90 degrees of arc (i.e. 9 1/2 pockets on a 38 pocket wheel) with considerable accuracy by taking a large random sample and finding an average.

It is the apparent lack of accuracy in “action at a distance” that has impelled many to question (or been used as a disingenuous excuse for questioning) the fundamental value of the relativity in “action at a distance.”

This was Laplace’s position in his debate with Boskovic. Laplace knew better random values could be obtained by using Boskovic’s “action at a distance” than Laplace’s traditional random theory. Laplace had to make his claim anyway for the political benefit of his backers. All the key players knew Laplace’s claim of game theory was false. They also knew Laplace would nevertheless appear to come out on top, since Boskovic was in fact using “action at a distance” to randomly find relative 120 degrees of arc, relative to the pi-angle base of the comet’s orbit …but couldn’t admit there was an advantage in the relativity since the subject was banned by the church and Boskovic was a priest.

The result of that debate was the loss of randomness and relativity, for purely political reasons, in both science and education.

let there be a random event on a circle. Calling it “relative” on a circle is meaningless relative to the randomness of gravity. It is only “meaningful” to other matters on the circle. Since a circle is only a perception relative to gravity, “relativity” on a “circle” is gravitationally meaningless.

This is to say: unless the randomness of the world is understood through the randomness of relative 1/4 pi, the term “relativity” –including its use by Albert Einstein– is gravitationally meaningless.

Let a random ball land anywhere. Call it pocket “0″ for convenience (since virtually everyone knows “00″ is directly opposite). It is the opposing poles we are interested in.

Pocket “0″ is meaninglessly “relative” to the circle of pockets on the wheel or game it is already a part of.

Pocket “0″ has a value of relative 1/4 pi, relative to the distance between pocket “0″ and pocket “00.”

Pocket “00″ is a relative pi-angle pole relative to the pi-angle base represented by “0.”

The relativity is proven with “action at a distance” as pocket “00″ appears at the third random trial, as the relative third pole of the pi-angle, with a .33333 geometric probability, factored by two directions.

The best traditional random theory can do is meaninglessly find the “relative pi-angle pole” as a Cardinal pole with a .25 algebraic possibility.

Relative to the randomness of gravity, relativity is meaningless on a circle of perception. Since we only know life through our sensory perceptions, relativity is meaningless to the random matters we perceive. Since gravity doesn’t recognize “shapes,” the “randomness” we perceives on a roulette wheel is gravitationally meaningless.

The randomness of a roulette wheel only has gravitational meaning through relative 1/4 pi.

Through relative 1/4 pi, the random gravitational truth is available …if “action at a distance” is used to look for it. Then relative 1/6 pi appears with the relativity grail of a flat bet advantage: .16666 .

These matters of relativity will also be statistically explored in the Cracking Pi Circus.

# 3/17/11

Written by G. T. Hushion. Posted in Articles

Let’s stay with relativity. A roulette wheel provides near ideal randomness.

We look at a roulette wheel and we see a roulette wheel. We can see and measure two dimensions: diameter and cross diameter. The two dimensions are the “game.” The “game” consists of the four end poles of the two dimensions. These are the four Cardinal poles: North/South, East/West.

Relative to the randomness of the game we perceive …on the dimensions we perceive of the wheel we perceive …every random event must land within one of the four Cardinal poles. This random statistical truth may be proven with every string of random measurements ever made. This is the foundation of traditional random theory.

Let there be three random trials and let a random ball land anywhere. Let the first trial be, for example, pocket “20.”

Relative to our perceptions of a wheel and a game and two dimensions, and traditional random theory, the pocket “20″ is a 1/38 possibility on a 38 pocket wheel.

Relative to traditional random theory …that is the end of the story of randomness and pocket “20″ or any other pocket.

However, what about Francoise Dulaurens, Isaac Newton, Rudjer Boskovic, Werner Heisenberg and John Stewart Bell? What about Quantum Mechanics and Bell’s Theorem? What about the gravity bet?

According to these men and theories and applications, traditional random theory is not the end of the story. Not by a long shot!

The flat bet .16666 advantage is based on the relativity inherent in “action at a distance.” This is the pulse of the work of Dulaurens, Newton, Boskovic, Heisenberg and John Stewart Bell …and now the gravity bet.

This is the relativity that was banned by the church and studied in secret at the Paris Academy of Sciences. This is the relativity that was lost in the French Revolution.

The important relativity was expressly in terms of game theory when it was secretly studied and lost in the 18th century.

The same relativity is here resurrected expressly in terms of game theory.

Pocket “20″ (or any other random pocket) is 12.5 % of the arc of the wheel it is centered in. This circumstance cannot yet be made relative
since it has yet to be measured with “action at a distance.” If it is the first in a series, it has nothing yet to be relative to.

Pocket “20″ is a pi-angle base relative to whatever comes next …except this relativity is meaningless since what comes next is the Center of Rotation …in which relativity is meaningless since the original Needle deductively proves the Center of Rotation is just the algebra of pi in rotation (or 1/2 pi in rotation or 1/4 pi in rotation: reader’s choice).

Pocket “20″ is the Center of Rotation relative to what came last. As discussed, the Center of Rotation is simply pi in rotation.

Pocket “20″ is the relative pi-angle pole relative to the second last event. This is the only meaningful relativity that is within pocket “20.” That relativity is a geometric probability.

While pocket “20″ is understood as random relative 1/4 pi under the original Needle, the relative pi-angle of pocket “20″ may be found as 1/6 pi when the original Needle is extended with “action at a distance.”

All of these matters start with the geometric probability of relative 1/4 pi.

In the first instance of randomness, pocket “20″ (and every other pocket) has a random value of relative 1/4 pi.

The Circus turns it into 1/6 pi and points its application from the street.

# 3/14/11

Written by G. T. Hushion. Posted in Articles

Good Morning,

It is National Pi Day. Perhaps appropriately, the Grinch of pi has delayed the Circus course for another few days.

Nevertheless, let the Circus begin. These daily articles will serve as an introduction.

In the first instance of randomness, these are matters of perception, not mathematics. The perception contains the utmost irony: the more intellect and education one has, the more difficult it is to admit the random geometric truth: relative to serial random measurements, every series of statistical results is just a statistical series of relative 1/4 pi in rotation. Within this truth is the relativity that eluded Einstein.

That geometric truth cannot be found with the serial random measurements of Monte Carlo methodology alone. Monte Carlo delivers the original Needle: relative 1/4 pi as the universal average random unit of measure. What spooked Einstein is that this turns into 1/6 pi over three serial random measurements. The flat bet advantage is the difference made relative back to relative 1/4 pi and factored by two directions.

This can only be found by superimposing “action at a distance” upon Monte Carlo methodology.

The result only makes sense if the resulting flat bet .16666 advantage is understood in terms of the random difference between 1/6 pi occurring naturally …and relative 1/4 pi being expected and “paying off” as such.

The difference starts with a fundamental matter of perception.

We see a wheel and it appears to have (at least) two dimensions: diameter dimension and cross-diameter dimension. Let the end poles of the two dimensions be the Cardinal poles: North/South and East/West. Each Cardinal pole is a .25 algebraic possibility of the circle. Relative to life’s perceptions, there must be a balance of dimensional possibilities. A 4 pocket wheel fits life’s perceptions.

Let there be a roulette wheel without frets or pockets. Let the “pockets” be painted on and the ball simply roll to a random stop. In the long run, if the average distance between one random ball and the next is anything other than one fourth of the distance around the wheel, the game is not fair. That distance is a Cardinal pole. Since the four Cardinal poles define the field or game’s dimensions, all randomly measured fields may be fundamentally understood as a four pocket roulette wheel. This is traditional random theory. It was proven by the original Needle when it automatically demonstrated its length of one fourth of a circle to be the universal random average.

The original Needle also proved its length of 1/4 C to be relative 1/4 pi, relative to the circle’s diameter.

It is here that science breaks down as it relies on traditional random theory and the quadrature it contains to try and understand relativity. It is mathematically impossible to understand relativity with quadrature.

By the proof of the original Needle, only relative 1/4 pi contains random gravitational reality and relativity …but not its simultaneous appearance as 1/4 C. This is because 1/4 C does not need to be “relative” to the circle. It is already an integral part of the circle.

When “action at a distance” is superimposed on Monte Carlo methodology (and therefore superimposed on a string of fractions of relative 1/4 pi each) “relative 1/4 pi” becomes predictable as a pi-angle pole with a random value of 1/6 pi.

This is similar to the situation of “1/4 C” not needing to be “relative” to something it is already a part of. The value “1/6 pi” (as the geometric probability of a pi-angle end pole) on a pi-angle does not need to be understood as “relative” to the pi-angle (or straight line pull of gravity) it is already part of.

This leads to the conclusion that, relative to randomness, the only relativity that has gravitational significance is relative 1/4 pi.

While it may appear 1/2 pi may qualify as having random “relativity,” it is also more fundamentally comprised of two measurements of random relative 1/4 pi. The far end pole of a semi circle is a Cardinal pole of relative 1/4 pi. However, the same point in time and space is found as the end pole of a diameter, with a random value of 1/6 pi, when it is looked for over three random measurements with “action at a distance.”

Let’s return to the 4 pocket roulette wheel. It doesn’t matter how many “pockets” are on the wheel, the average distance around the wheel is always 1/4 of the distance around the wheel.

If Monte Carlo is used without “action at a distance,” the average distance between one random events and the next will always be 1/4 C …or relative 1/4 pi.

If Monte Carlo is used with “action at a distance,” the average distance between one random events and the next will still always be 1/4 C …or relative 1/4 pi …with something extra. With “action at a distance,” at every third measurement, what would otherwise be expected as simply another possibility of relative 1/4 pi on a circle …suddenly becomes a predictable geometric probability of 1/6 pi on the circle or field or wheel or game’s diameter.

These matters are most easily understood in the simple random context of gaming.

Adjustments must be made when non random factors are introduced and the field is no longer a circle, but another “shape.” In such instances, the gravitational structure remains the same but the finesse methodology of “action at a distance” must be taken to deeper levels.

The Cracking Pi Circus is intended to help users of geometric probability identify new fields to be measured with “action at a distance.”

The 4 pocket wheel is the model from which to understand these matters. Relative to life’s perception (this has nothing to do with relative to randomness of gravity) we see a wheel with two equal dimensions and 4 equal pockets.

However, relative to the randomness of gravity (this has nothing to do with the randomness we perceive) all that is rotating and being randomly measured is the straight line of gravity’s pull along a single dimension. By the proof of the original Needle, the relative cross dimension is simply a mathematical average …just relative 1/4 pi in rotation.

Draw a wheel or circle of four pockets. Let a random ball land in “South.” Draw a dotted line between East and West. Draw a straight line between South and North.

Relative to the random event of gravity’s straight line pull on the South/North diameter, the relative cross diameter is just relative pi in rotation. It is just a mathematical perception. So, relative to gravity, the circle is also just a mathematical perception. That is: C = 4 (1/4 C).

Relative to South, the diameter is a pi-angle of three poles. South is a pi-angle base. The Center of Rotation is the pi-angle’s middle pole. North is the pi-angle pole.

Under traditional random theory, the diameter and cross diameter are equal, like apples and apples.

Under “action at a distance,” the diameter and cross diameter are not two similar fruits in the structure of the universe. They are different fruits in completely different dimensions: gravity versus perception.

The difference between gravity and perception cannot be perceived. It can only be statistically understood. That understanding cannot be made with traditional random theory. It can only be found with “action at a distance.

All randomly measured fields –from wheels to cards; from bio-distributions to inventory control; from psychology to the stock market– can be understood as though on a roulette wheel. Regardless of how many pockets are on the wheel (0 or 12 or 13 or 37 or 38 or 52 or a zillion) the average distance between one random event and the next is 1/4 C. This sets up geometric probability.

That is: in a random series of anything, “action at a distance” is between North and South without the intervention of East or West. The intervention is achieved with the geometric finesse automatically contained in “action at a distance.” By the proof of the original Needle, relative 1/4 pi is the unit of measure. The result of “action at a distance” is that, relative to South, at the third trial, relative North is found, with a geometric probability of .33333, as the third pole on the pi-angle of three poles. This delivers the flat bet advantage as traditional random theory expects (and “pays off”) North as a Cardinal pole with a .25 algebraic expectation. This difference is factored by two possible directions on the possibilities of the “game” (or circle or wheel) with the geometric certainty of one direction on the geometric probability of the pi-angle.

That is: 2 (.33333 – .25) = .16666 .

Everything random may be understood on a 4 pocket wheel. Every 4 pocket wheel inherently contains a .16666 flat bet advantage.

Extracting the advantage requires a psychological leap. This is the price of “action at a distance.” It is an extremely simple jump to make, but it is entirely mental. This is apparently why even physicists with several advanced degrees cannot understand the “hidden variables” and “entanglements” of Quantum theory. This is also appears why Quantum Theory is generally stuck in the laboratory measuring particles with “action at a distance” to get a .08333 flat bet advantage over traditional random theory and expectations.

The .08333 advantage of Quantum theory may be said to be algebraically identical with the .16666 flat bet advantage of the gravity bet. That is: Quantum theory predicts the relative pi-angle pole with a .08333 advantage relative to a semi-circle.

In slight contrast, the gravity bet uses the same methodology to come to a .16666 advantage relative to the complete circle.

The only way Quantum theorists can understand their “hidden variables” and mysterious “entanglements” is to admit the random geometric truth. That is: relative to randomness, the particles and the wheels and games and measurements, including the physicists themselves and their advanced degrees and education, including the games and experiments and traditional random game theory, including casinos and tables and players and their chips, including stock market players and their predictions and stocks and winning and losing …are all …just relative 1/4 pi in rotation.

Welcome to the Cracking Pi Circus.